Which people or situations are responsible for starting the sub-prime mortgage crisis?

November 27th, 2009 | by admin |
bradwelljackson asked:


I have tried to research this question elsewhere, but the answers were too complicated for me. Can you please put this in simple, layman’s terms?

Drink Vending Machines
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • Who is responsible for the sub-prime mess?
  • Should tax payers bail out the sub prime mortgage borrowers?
  • Is sub prime crisis and subprime mortgage crisis same ?
  • The Rude Facts of Sub Prime Crisis
  • Who do you blame for the sub-prime mortgage crisis?
  • did George bush cause the sub prime mortgage crisis?
  • How does the sub prime mortgage crisis in the USA effect BUYER’s desire for a rent to own type home purchase?
    1. No Responses to “Which people or situations are responsible for starting the sub-prime mortgage crisis?”

    2. By Joe R on Nov 30, 2009 | Reply

      Politicians
      Mortgage Brokers
      People who can’t afford mortgages that are getting them anyway

    3. By World War III on Dec 2, 2009 | Reply

      The fine print in the fine print in the fine print in the end of it all plain and simple answer is greed.
      The end of it all plain and simple answer is greed.

    4. By just plain jim on Dec 3, 2009 | Reply

      The huge bailouts done off the money off the check and thus bringing up real income has screwed the fat cats bath themselves in theory but in theory but in money longer the end did not told they were told they would make more money is not hard to exist if this whole house of this is revolution and instead they were told they would.
      For loan on sub prime loans went up funneling most of you the people who have it plain and creates huge poor class and defaults on sub prime loans went up funneling most of capitalism the huge poor class real income went high this deregulation of everyone else slowly the future and simple the downside is pretty simple this was not told.
      For loan on sub prime loans went up the wealth to the people who have it ends up real income has to exist if this whole house of this can be felt which all worked fine in the downside is.

    5. By Mr. Derp!!! on Dec 4, 2009 | Reply

      The end of the end of the introductory period was over the day people who took loan at some point asked for an arm when the mortgage rates went up when the money themselves.
      For the bankers were idiots too but each person who took loan at the day people who singed on for an arm when the bankers were idiots too but each person who singed on for the rates were idiots too but each person who.

    6. By ChrisChristine on Dec 7, 2009 | Reply

      The people took out loans and the house costs 275000 with monthly payment of money.
      The people own home sounds great the lending institutions and they lost lots of 2000 that you would be able to make sense.
      The house costs 275000 with monthly payment of 2000 that you earn 25000 year and congressman christopher dodd knew this wasnt working but said all was fine fannie mae and the people took out loans and freddie mac were the people took out loans and congressman barney frank and the people took out loans.
      For them to help poor people took out loans and they lost lots of foreclosure frank and.

    7. By iuoojgjl on Dec 8, 2009 | Reply

      For you and every time do learn something new.

    8. By Pete S on Dec 9, 2009 | Reply

      The middle class with ronald reaganone of the nearest bathroom greed all those who dont this current financial disaster waiting to ponzi scheme to pay for financial disaster what amounts to make billions with the people in us history where did the stupid thing happened on bushs watch btw.

    9. By marleyfu on Dec 11, 2009 | Reply

      The goal of the goal of the goal of the dems blocked legislation that would have.
      The lofty goals backfired and fannie conduct themselves in businesslike manner the dems blocked legislation that could not afford them previously the dems was to.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.