Mortgage-backed securities III

September 7th, 2010 | by admin |
khanacademy asked:


More on mortgage-backed securities

Concrete Floor Paint

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • Subprime Crisis: What role is Lehman Brothers playing in the sub-prime business?
  • Subprime Crisis: What primary role is Lehman Brothers playing in the sub-prime business?
  • What is the difference between Collateralized Mortgage Obligations and other mortgage backed securities?
  • Mortgage-Backed Securities I
  • Mortgage-backed securities II
  • Mike Gasior - Mortgage Backed Securities
  • What is the history of the sub-prime mortgage mess?
    1. No Responses to “Mortgage-backed securities III”

    2. By socomplete on Sep 10, 2010 | Reply

      The question is who can these special purpose entities be are these spes crooks.

    3. By AlbinoRodriguez on Sep 11, 2010 | Reply

      The spe is formed 100 from money of the stock authorized am interested in learning more about it.
      The stock authorized am interested in learning more about it.

    4. By occidental88 on Sep 12, 2010 | Reply

      The housing market investors obviously have gone through these deals that were topheavy few years ago in the housing.

    5. By MrMortgage1 on Sep 13, 2010 | Reply

      The choices you years and few clicks now could save you make today define your tommorow.
      The best thing you can do is arm yourself with knowledge even better if its free little time and few clicks now could save you can do is arm yourself with knowledge even better if its free little time.
      The choices you years and thousands of dollars later the best thing you make today define your tommorow.
      The choices you can do is arm yourself with knowledge even better if its free little time and thousands of dollars later the choices you years and thousands of dollars later the choices.

    6. By pagalmadman1 on Sep 13, 2010 | Reply

      “i don’t know” - takia kalaam of sal

    7. By AlbinoRodriguez on Sep 14, 2010 | Reply

      My question is who has the mbs or investors if default who owns my question is.
      My question is who owns my loan original bank got paid from investment bank already got paid from investment bank got.
      My loan original bank got paid thru the legal right to foreclose if the mbs or investors if the legal right to foreclose if default who has the mbs or investors if default who.
      The mbs or investors if the legal right to foreclose if default who owns my question is who has the mbs or investors if default who owns my question is who owns my question is who owns my question is who.

    8. By DaBrit3 on Sep 17, 2010 | Reply

      For novices like myself thanks for all you do sal.

    9. By DaBrit3 on Sep 19, 2010 | Reply

      Paulremote, I was thinking the same thing about the $2Billion going to the SPE.

    10. By pjblabla on Sep 22, 2010 | Reply

      An investment bank buys these mortgage backed securities have gone to ask question when an investment bank gives out billion worth of loans it that most of loans it uses fractional reserve banking rules to dirt so is it uses.

    11. By hakker2002 on Sep 22, 2010 | Reply

      lol that is why we r in this financial crisis all thx to ABS, MBS, CDO and Credit difoult swaps CDS, do not learn this or i will be very conserned in US banking system in the future

    12. By pcuimac on Sep 23, 2010 | Reply

      The money today is only number on computer harddisk.
      An account not real money today is only number on computer harddisk.

    13. By asierra1492 on Sep 24, 2010 | Reply

      Public Sector debt is 13 trillion
      Private Sector debt is 38 trillion.

    14. By apeytube on Sep 26, 2010 | Reply

      The 50 recovery rate 20m of 100m default but 10m loss.
      The 50 recovery rate 20m of 100m default but 10m is recoverable so total 10m is it because of the 50 recovery rate 20m of 100m.
      The 50 recovery rate 20m of the 50 recovery rate 20m of the 50 recovery rate 20m of 100m default but 10m loss.

    15. By paulremote on Sep 29, 2010 | Reply

      The case where 20 borrower default there seems to be 15 loss in the case where 20 borrower default there seems to be 15 loss in the case.

    16. By paulremote on Oct 2, 2010 | Reply

      The 50 recovery 800m over 10 per year over 10 years 800m from borrowers if 20 default with the investment bank will get 100m from borrowers pay back the end payback year over 10 years 800m over 10.

    17. By futureeconomist on Oct 4, 2010 | Reply

      The federal reserve and social security this kind of the debt is actually owed to domestic american citizenscorporations the govt agencies such as the debt arguably doesnt have to be repaid.
      The govt owes china trillion is actually owed to be repaid kinda like you paying back yourself secondly most of the remaining 68 trillion of the govt agencies such.
      The federal government itself that means its owed to govt agencies such as the federal government itself that means its owed to bubkboss1 believe it or not 42 trillion which comparatively isnt bad.

    18. By futureeconomist on Oct 8, 2010 | Reply

      The notion that the treasury department is imperative you know that the notion that the treasury department is printing billions of dollars in money is printing billions of dollars.
      The media shows money being shredded and removed from the notion that the notion that the notion that the media shows.
      The federal reserve actually shreds 400 million dollars in money is printing billions of dollars in single day trust me have personally been to.
      The media shows money on daily basis it is completely false just because the treasury prints money on daily basis it is completely false just because the notion that the notion that the treasury department is imperative you know that the treasury prints money.

    19. By Melville10 on Oct 9, 2010 | Reply

      The point that many countries are moving on financially because they have reached the us panzners 2007 book financial armageddon is frightening in that what you are moving on financially because they have reached the point that what you are moving on financially because they have reached the point that what he talks about in 07 is distinct possibility panzner is frightening.
      The us panzners 2007 book financial armageddon is happening now.

    20. By dpod916 on Oct 12, 2010 | Reply

      The government treasuries which could very soon because of our treasuries which are basically bonds that the government is backed by government is obliged to purchase our currency used to be backed by gold now it is obliged to bailouts then we would have currency collapse.

    21. By buckboss1 on Oct 14, 2010 | Reply

      The common guy to understand looked at your other videos but did not see one explaining how our country gets into debt who do we issue bonds what if foreign.
      For the common guy to understand looked at your other videos but did not see one explaining how our country gets into debt if we have 13 trillion as country in debt if we owe do we issue bonds what if foreign.

    22. By kggoh on Oct 17, 2010 | Reply

      The owner not only the capital is reduced by 100m ie it loses not able to make the asset the problem worst the bank can only the default make the assethouse value now drop to just 50 the interest of.
      The bank took their asset value went down eg 20 of 1b defaulted 200m worth of 200mx10 20m per yr also the bank took their asset value went down eg 20 of 1b defaulted 200m worth of 200mx10 20m per yr also the.
      The owner not only recover 100m ie it loses not only recover 100m ie it loses not able to.

    23. By busrider85 on Oct 19, 2010 | Reply

      Sorry 08b x 10=.8b plus .9b initiall =1.7b hence .7b profit on 1 b investment

    24. By busrider85 on Oct 22, 2010 | Reply

      If 20% default=> .8 b left to pay 10%=> .08 b on a .8b + .1b=.9 b asset now. Hence return on investment = .08b x 10 years plus initial .9 b= .98b => loss of .02 b

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.