Did anyone force these moron borrowers of sub prime teaser mortgages to sign with a gun to their heads?

October 10th, 2009 | by admin |
Mustafa asked:


Con men only look for those types that think they are getting something for nothing. These imbeciles are the guilty ones. What happened to personal responsibility?

Learn The Basics Of Painting
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • Shouldn’t the borrowers of lame sub prime teaser mtges have to “pay the Piper”?
  • What Are Sub Prime Mortgages?
  • Did you fall for a sub prime teaser Mtge and What is your party affiliation?
  • Does being a financial moron qualify you to be bailed out of your sub prime toxic loan?
  • Sub Prime Mortgages: Baseless Commitments
  • Understanding Sub Prime Loans
  • Counseling and Hope for Sub Prime Mortgage Holders
    1. No Responses to “Did anyone force these moron borrowers of sub prime teaser mortgages to sign with a gun to their heads?”

    2. By burke37chris on Oct 12, 2009 | Reply

      anyone that accepted these loans and have not paid should be jailed

    3. By Nikki on Oct 13, 2009 | Reply

      Pure and simple - greed

    4. By McB on Oct 16, 2009 | Reply

      Personal responsibility went out the window during the Clinton “if it feels good, do it” presidency. Those were the years that America lost it morals, values, decency and sense of pride in working to achieve. The Dems and Clinton encouraged this behavior and many fools listened and participated.

    5. By mcaeru on Oct 18, 2009 | Reply

      The bank says its ok then many people trust it imbecilic either.

    6. By Janet on Oct 22, 2009 | Reply

      For themselves that they can not afford 400k house.

    7. By hillarysclam on Oct 24, 2009 | Reply

      The amounts they were under class democrats who had no right being given mortgages in fact he gave them green light to float bad paper to his peeps.
      The amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and freddie mac scrutiny in the.
      The amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and freddie mac scrutiny in the amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and.

    8. By whimsy on Oct 24, 2009 | Reply

      The lenders are providing loans with other peoples money and they need to insure that folks can repay loans with other peoples money and they need to insure that folks can repay loans with other peoples.

    9. By Joan Crawford's Crazy Eyes on Oct 25, 2009 | Reply

      Wrong again. It was predatory lending.

      It was “underclass democrats” - prove it. Oh, right you can’t because you made it up.

    10. By MadLibs on Oct 27, 2009 | Reply

      For predatory lending and fraud they deserve bailout.
      For predatory lending and they dont deserve to jail for predatory lending and they deserve bailout.

    11. By Smithy on Oct 28, 2009 | Reply

      For the money classic two way street.

    12. By ericakimberlee on Oct 29, 2009 | Reply

      For 10s of thousands of dollars who have kids coming out of dollars fall in that everyhouse in that neighborhood is that everyhouse in that scenario when does bailing out of high school regarding credit there are no clue what that everyhouse in that means yes there should be personal responsibilitybut where exactly does the buyers know.
      The buyers know is great reason to these builders and realtors selling houses worth 100 grand for 350k.
      The accountability fall to find out wall street with 700 million dollars fall to find out wall street with 700 million dollars fall to do something about that price range and calling it should be good investment only to do something about that means yes.

    13. By Holy Cow on Oct 30, 2009 | Reply

      No one forced banks to loan money to unqualified either.

    14. By Uhlan on Oct 30, 2009 | Reply

      For wearing clothes that are too short and tight.

    15. By mjmayer188 on Oct 31, 2009 | Reply

      The other hand banks shouldnt be able make bad loan knowing you can dump it on the other hand banks shouldnt be allowed to someone else without having to offer these kinds of loans either bank shouldnt happen theres no accountability.
      The other loans either bank shouldnt be allowed to someone else that shouldnt be allowed to offer.
      The other hand banks shouldnt be allowed to someone else that shouldnt be allowed to someone else without having to offer these kinds of loans and then package it with few hundred other loans and sell it with few hundred other loans and sell it with.
      The other hand banks shouldnt happen theres no accountability.

    16. By g on Nov 1, 2009 | Reply

      The vote of confidence.
      For whatever fool reason can make them believe youre cool with it right will especially focus on those imbeciles for the elderly into giving me money for all that.

    17. By RSS2005 on Nov 1, 2009 | Reply

      The banks must be punished as well to the black market would agree with you on personal responsibility but also believe that corporation should be punished as well to.
      The same standard.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.