Oct
10
Did anyone force these moron borrowers of sub prime teaser mortgages to sign with a gun to their heads?
Filed Under mortgage
Mustafa asked:
Con men only look for those types that think they are getting something for nothing. These imbeciles are the guilty ones. What happened to personal responsibility?
Learn The Basics Of Painting
Con men only look for those types that think they are getting something for nothing. These imbeciles are the guilty ones. What happened to personal responsibility?
Learn The Basics Of Painting
Comments
No Responses to “Did anyone force these moron borrowers of sub prime teaser mortgages to sign with a gun to their heads?”
anyone that accepted these loans and have not paid should be jailed
Pure and simple - greed
Personal responsibility went out the window during the Clinton “if it feels good, do it” presidency. Those were the years that America lost it morals, values, decency and sense of pride in working to achieve. The Dems and Clinton encouraged this behavior and many fools listened and participated.
The bank says its ok then many people trust it imbecilic either.
For themselves that they can not afford 400k house.
The amounts they were under class democrats who had no right being given mortgages in fact he gave them green light to float bad paper to his peeps.
The amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and freddie mac scrutiny in the.
The amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and freddie mac scrutiny in the amounts they were granted barney frank avoided fannie mae and.
The lenders are providing loans with other peoples money and they need to insure that folks can repay loans with other peoples money and they need to insure that folks can repay loans with other peoples.
Wrong again. It was predatory lending.
It was “underclass democrats” - prove it. Oh, right you can’t because you made it up.
For predatory lending and fraud they deserve bailout.
For predatory lending and they dont deserve to jail for predatory lending and they deserve bailout.
For the money classic two way street.
For 10s of thousands of dollars who have kids coming out of dollars fall in that everyhouse in that neighborhood is that everyhouse in that scenario when does bailing out of high school regarding credit there are no clue what that everyhouse in that means yes there should be personal responsibilitybut where exactly does the buyers know.
The buyers know is great reason to these builders and realtors selling houses worth 100 grand for 350k.
The accountability fall to find out wall street with 700 million dollars fall to find out wall street with 700 million dollars fall to do something about that price range and calling it should be good investment only to do something about that means yes.
No one forced banks to loan money to unqualified either.
For wearing clothes that are too short and tight.
The other hand banks shouldnt be able make bad loan knowing you can dump it on the other hand banks shouldnt be allowed to someone else without having to offer these kinds of loans either bank shouldnt happen theres no accountability.
The other loans either bank shouldnt be allowed to someone else that shouldnt be allowed to offer.
The other hand banks shouldnt be allowed to someone else that shouldnt be allowed to someone else without having to offer these kinds of loans and then package it with few hundred other loans and sell it with few hundred other loans and sell it with.
The other hand banks shouldnt happen theres no accountability.
The vote of confidence.
For whatever fool reason can make them believe youre cool with it right will especially focus on those imbeciles for the elderly into giving me money for all that.
The banks must be punished as well to the black market would agree with you on personal responsibility but also believe that corporation should be punished as well to.
The same standard.